RAGMetricsAI QA

Top 10 LLM Evaluation Metrics for RAG Systems

K
Kiran Bose
ML Engineer, SENTINEL-X · 2026-04-28 · 10 min read

Evaluating RAG systems is complex because quality depends on two independent components: retrieval quality and generation quality. A perfect retrieval pipeline can still produce hallucinated answers, and a perfect generator is useless with poor retrieval.

Here are the 10 metrics that matter most — and how to automate them with SENTINEL-X.

1. Retrieval Precision — What fraction of retrieved chunks are actually relevant to the query? Target: >85%.

2. Retrieval Recall — What fraction of all relevant chunks were retrieved? Target: >90% for critical applications.

3. Context Relevance — How relevant is the retrieved context to the specific question? SENTINEL-X scores this 0-1 using an LLM judge.

4. Answer Faithfulness — Does the generated answer only contain information present in the retrieved context? The most important metric for preventing hallucinations.

5. Answer Relevance — Does the answer actually address the question that was asked? Catches responses that are factually grounded but miss the point.

6. Semantic Similarity — How similar is the answer to the ground truth? Useful for closed-domain QA where ground truth exists.

7. Citation Accuracy — If the model cites sources, are those citations correct? Critical for legal and medical applications.

8. Latency P95 — What is the 95th percentile end-to-end latency? User experience depends on this.

9. Token Efficiency — How many tokens does retrieval add to the context? Directly impacts cost.

10. Consistency — Given the same question twice, does the system give the same answer? Inconsistency often indicates poor retrieval.

SENTINEL-X automatically computes all 10 metrics on every evaluation run, giving you a single quality score and detailed breakdowns for debugging.

Try SENTINEL-X for free

14-day free trial. No credit card required.

Start Free Trial
← Back to Blog